Twelve Step Facilitation.com

Education for Twelve Step Facilitation of alcoholism and addiction

Sparrow



  • AA Membership

    AA Membership 2005

    Because A.A. has never attempted to keep formal membership lists, it is extremely difficult to obtain completely accurate figures on total membership at any given time. Some local groups are not listed with the General Service Office. Others do not provide membership data, thus are not recorded on the G.S.O. computer records. The membership figures listed below are based on reports to the General Service Office as of January 1, 2005, plus an average allowance for groups that have not reported their membership.

    Estimated A.A. Membership and Group Information

    • Groups in U.S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,651
    • Members in U.S. . . . . . . . . . . .. . 1,190,637
    • Groups in Canada . . . . . . . . . . .. 4,872
    • Members in Canada . . . . . . . . . . 95,984
    • Groups Outside of U.S./Canada . . 45,209
    • Members Outside of U.S./Canada . 729,097
    • Internationalists . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
    • Groups in Correctional Facilities U.S./Canada. . . . . 2,562
    • Members in Correctional Facilities U.S./Canada .. . 66,963
    • Lone Members . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223

    Total Reported

    • 2,082,980 Members
    • 105,294 Groups

    From; A.A. FACT FILE at www.aa.org


    Alcoholics Anonymous: The Story of How Many Thousands of Men and Women Have Recovered from Alcoholism

    Posted in 12-Step Groups, Alcohol, Alcoholism, Research. Use this permalink for a bookmark.

    * * * * *

    Adolescents 12-step Group Participation

    Can 12-step group participation strengthen and extend the benefits of adolescent addiction treatment? A prospective analysis

    Background

    Despite advances in the development of treatments for adolescents with substance use disorders (SUD), relapse remains common following an index treatment episode. Community continuing care resources, such as Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and Narcotics Anonymous (NA), have been shown to be helpful and cost-effective recovery resources among adults. However, little is known about the clinical utility and effectiveness of AA/NA for adolescents, despite widespread treatment referrals.

    Method

    Adolescents (N = 127; 24% female, 87% White, M age = 16.7 years) enrolled in a naturalistic, prospective study of community outpatient treatment were assessed at intake, and 3 and 6 months later using a battery of standardized and validated measures.

    Results

    Just over one-quarter of youth attended AA/NA meetings during the first 3 months, which was predicted by a goal of abstinence, prior AA/NA attendance, and prior SUD treatment experiences. Controlled multiple regression analyses revealed an independent effect of AA/NA on abstinence, in both contemporaneous and lagged models, which persisted over and above the effects of pre-treatment AA/NA attendance, prior treatment, self-efficacy, abstinence goal, and concomitant outpatient treatment.

    Conclusions

    Results suggest that, similar to findings comparing adult outpatients to inpatients, AA/NA participation is less common among less severe adolescent outpatients. Nonetheless, attendance appears to strengthen and extend the benefits of typical community outpatient treatment. Given the dramatic increase in rates of substance use among same-aged peers in the population at this life-stage, and the relative dearth of abstainers and recovery-specific supports, these resources may provide a concentrated cost-effective social recovery resource for young people.

    Can 12-step group participation strengthen and extend the benefits of adolescent addiction treatment? A prospective analysis. John F. Kelly, Sarah J. Dow, Julie D. Yeterian and Christopher W. Kahle. Drug and Alcohol Dependence

    See also

    Posted in 12-Step Groups, Alcoholics Anon, Narcotics Anon, Self-help, Youth and tagged , , . Use this permalink for a bookmark.

    * * * * *

    Risky Partners and Domestic Violence

    DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HURTS 035 altered

    Domestic violence

    Intimate partner violence against women is prevalent and is associated with poor health outcomes.

    Understanding indicators of exposure to intimate partner violence can assist health care professionals to identify and respond to abused women. This study was undertaken to determine the strength of association between selected evidence-based risk indicators and exposure to intimate partner violence.

    In this cross-sectional study of 768 women aged 18-64 years who presented to 2 emergency departments in Ontario, Canada, participants answered questions about risk indicators and completed the Composite Abuse Scale to determine their exposure to intimate partner violence in the past year.

    Results: Intimate partner violence was significantly associated with

    • being separated,
    • in a common-law relationship or
    • single
    • depression
    • somatic symptoms
    • having a male partner who was employed less than part time, or
    • having a partner with an alcohol or
    • drug problem

    Each unit increase in the number of indicators corresponded to a four-fold increase in the risk of intimate partner violence; women with 3 or more indicators had a greater than 50% probability of a positive score on the Composite Abuse Scale.

    Intimate partner violence was not associated with pregnancy status.

    Specific characteristics of male partners, relationships and women’s mental health are significantly related to exposure to intimate partner violence in the past year. Identification of these indicators has implications for the clinical care of women who present to health care settings. (Source: Open Medicine

    Posted in Alcohol, Alcoholism, Co-dependency, Drugs, Men, Research, Women and tagged , , . Use this permalink for a bookmark.

    * * * * *

    Double Trouble in Recovery

    One-Year Outcomes among Members of a Dual-Recovery Self-Help Program.

    Research Objective:Self-help is gaining increased acceptance among treatment professionals as empirical support for of its effectiveness is growing and the advent of managed care warrants the use of cost-effective modalities. Traditional “one disease-one recovery” self-help programs cannot serve adequately the needs of the dually-diagnosed.

    This paper presents one-year outcome data from a longitudinal study of the effectiveness of self-help for the dually-diagnosed.

    Subjects are members of Double Trouble in Recovery (DTR), a 12-step self-help program designed to meet the special needs of those diagnosed with both a mental health disorder and a chemical addiction.Study.

    Design:The study uses a 12-month prospective longitudinal design with follow-ups at 12 and 24 months after baseline. Subjects (N = 310) were recruited at 25 DTR meeting sites throughout New York City. Semi-structured instruments assess history and current status of mental health and substance abuse, treatment in both areas, and self help participation (DTR as well as traditional 12-step groups such as AA and NA).

    Population Studied:Community-based individuals dually-diagnosed with a mental health disorder and substance abuse.

    Principal Findings:S’s are mostly members of underserved minority groups with long histories of substance abuse and mental health disorders.

    Most S’s attend outpatient treatment (for drug use, mental health or dual-diagnosis – 77%) and take psychotropic medications (87%).

    At the 12 months follow-up,

    • 76% were still attending DTR;
    • 68% were also attending AA or NA.

    Mean number of symptoms S’s. experienced in the past year decreased significantly;

    • two-thirds (69%) of S’s reported that their mental health was “better” in the past month than it was at baseline.
    • One-third (29%) reported substance use in the past year, compared to 42% at baseline (p = .002).

    Substance use (less) was significantly associated with DTR attendance:

    • Total time abstinent was related to lifetime length of DTR attendance (r = .25, p = .002) and
    • past year substance use was related to number of months of DTR attendance in the past year (r = -.17, p = .02).

    Conclusions:For dually-diagnosed individuals, continued participation in dual recovery self-help groups plays a significant role in the recovery process, particularly in the area of substance use.

    Implications for Policy, Delivery or Practice:Participation in dual-recovery self-help groups, both during and after formal treatment, should be encouraged as part of an integrated lifelong recovery plan for dually-diagnosed individuals.

    Research; One-Year Outcomes among Members of a Dual-Recovery Self-Help Program. Laudet A, Magura S, Vogel H, Knight E, Staines G; Abstr Acad Health Serv Res Health Policy Meet. 2000; 17.

    More at; Double Trouble in Recovery

    See also;

    Posted in 12-Step Groups, Addiction, Adjunctive therapy, Alcohol, Alcoholism, Assessment, Contrast to other models, Mutual-help, Policy, Recovery, Research, Self-help, Target populations and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Use this permalink for a bookmark.

    * * * * *

    Getting active in AA

    Living SoberGetting active in Recovery in AA

    This is an extract from the book ‘Living Sober’ target=_blank>Living Sober’ by Alcoholics Anonymous.

    It is very hard just to sit still trying not to do a certain thing, or not even to think about it. It’s much easier to get active and do something else-other than the act we’re trying to avoid.

    So it is with drinking. Simply trying to avoid a drink (or not think of one), all by itself, doesn’t seem to be enough. The more we think about the drink we’re trying to keep away from, the more it occupies our mind, of course. And that’s no good. It’s better to get busy with something, almost anything, that will use our mind and channel our energy toward health.

    Thousands of us wondered what we would do, once we stopped drinking, with all that time on our hands. Sure enough, when we did stop, all those hours we had once spent planning, getting our drinks, drinking, and recovering from its immediate effects, suddenly turned into big, empty holes of time that had to be filled somehow.

    Most of us had jobs to do. But even so, there were some pretty long, vacant stretches of minutes and hours staring at us. We needed new habits of activity to fill those open spaces and utilize the nervous energy previously absorbed by our preoccupation, or our obsession, with drinking.

    Anyone who has ever tried to break a habit knows that substituting a new and different activity is easier than just stopping the old activity and putting nothing in its place.

    Recovered alcoholics often say, "Just stopping drinking is not enough." Just not drinking is a negative, sterile thing. That is clearly demonstrated by our experience. To stay stopped, we’ve found we need to put in place of the drinking a positive program of action. We’ve had to learn how to live sober.

    Fear may have originally pushed some of us toward looking into the possibility that we might have a drinking problem. And over a short period, fear alone may help some of us stay away from a drink. But a fearful state is not a very happy or relaxed one to maintain for very long. So we try to develop a healthy respect for the power of alcohol, instead of a fear of it, just as people have a healthy respect for cyanide, iodine, or any other poison. Without going around in constant fear of those potions, most people respect what they can do to the body, and have enough sense not to imbibe them. We in A.A. now have the same knowledge of, and regard for, alcohol. But, of course, it is based on firsthand experience, not on seeing a skull and crossbones on a label.

    We can’t rely on fear to get us through those empty hours without a drink, so what can we do?

    We have found many kinds of activity useful and profitable, some more than others. Here are two kinds, in the order of their effectiveness as we experienced it.

    A. Activity in and around A.A.

    When experienced A.A. members say that they found "getting active" helpful in their recovery from alcoholism, they usually mean getting active in and around A.A.

    B. Activity Not related to A.A.

    It’s curious, but true, that some of us, when we first stop drinking, Seem to experience a sort of temporary failure of the imagination.

    It’s curious, because during our drinking days, so many of us displayed almost unbelievably fertile powers of imagination. In less than a week, we could dream up instantly more reasons (excuses?) for drinking than most people use for all other purposes in a lifetime. (Incidentally, it’s a pretty good rule of thumb that normal drinkers-that is, nonalcoholics-never need or use any particular justification for either drinking or not drinking!)

    When the need to give ourselves reasons for our drinking is no longer there, it often seems that our minds go on a sit own strike. Some of us find we can’t think up nondrinking things to do! Perhaps this is because we’re just out of the habit.

    The following list is just a starter for use at that time. It isn’t very thrilling or adventurous, but it covers the kinds of activity many of us have used to fill our first vacant hours when we were not at our jobs or with other nondrinking people. We know they work. We did such things as:

    • Taking walks
    • Reading
    • Going to museums and art galleries.
    • Exercising swimming, golfing, jogging, yoga, or other forms of exercise your doctor advises.
    • Starting on long-neglected chores
    • Trying a new hobby
    • Revisiting an old pastime
    • Taking a course.
    • Volunteering
    • Doing something about your personal appearance.
    • Taking a fling at something frivolous! Not everything we do has to be an earnest effort at self-improvement, although any such effort is worthwhile and gives a lift to our self-esteem. Many of us find it important to balance serious periods with things we do for pure fun.
    • Fill this one in for yourself. Let’s hope the list above sparked an idea for you which is different from all of those listed. . . . It did? Good! Go to it.

    One word of caution, though. Some of us find we have a tendency to go overboard, and try too many things at once. The best approach is called "Easy Does It."

    Living Sober’ target=_blank>Living Sober by AA

    Posted in Alcoholics Anon, Alcoholism and tagged , . Use this permalink for a bookmark.

    * * * * *

    Seventeen Percent of Hospital Patients Drink Too Much

    The severity of unhealthy alcohol use in hospitalized medical patients; The spectrum is narrow

    BACKGROUND: Professional organizations recommend screening and brief intervention for unhealthy alcohol use; however, brief intervention has established efficacy only for people without alcohol dependence. Whether many medical inpatients with unhealthy alcohol use have nondependent use, and thus might benefit from brief intervention, is unknown.

    OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and spectrum of unhealthy alcohol use in medical inpatients.

    DESIGN: Interviews of medical inpatients (March 2001 to June 2003).

    SUBJECTS: Adult medical inpatients (5,813) in an urban teaching hospital.

    MEASUREMENTS: Proportion drinking risky amounts in the past month (defined by national standards); proportion drinking risky amounts with a current alcohol diagnosis (determined by diagnostic interview).

    RESULTS:

    • Seventeen percent (986) were drinking risky amounts;
    • 97% exceeded per occasion limits.
    • Most scored greater than 8 on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, strongly correlating with alcohol diagnoses.
    • Most of a subsample of subjects who drank risky amounts and received further evaluation had dependence (77%).

    CONCLUSIONS: Drinking risky amounts was common in medical inpatients.

    Most drinkers of risky amounts had dependence, not the broad spectrum of unhealthy alcohol use anticipated.

    Screening on a medicine service largely identifies patients with dependence-a group for whom the efficacy of brief intervention (a recommended practice) is not well established.

    Research; Richard Saitz, Naomi Freedner, Tibor P. Palfai, Nicholas J. Horton and Jeffrey H. Samet. The severity of unhealthy alcohol use in hospitalized medical patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine, Volume 21, Number 4 / April, 2006

    Brief-TSF addresses these issues

    Posted in Alcohol, Alcoholism, Brief-TSF, Research, Target populations. Use this permalink for a bookmark.

    * * * * *

    Adolescents have deficits in frontal brain activation

     

    Synapse x 10000 Adolescents at risk of developing a substance-use disorder have deficits in frontal brain activation

    < Brain synapse x 10,000

    Children and adolescents at high risk for developing a substance-use disorder (SUD) tend to show deficits in executive cognitive function (ECF). A study using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to assess eye movements in adolescents has found a link between brain functioning and risk for developing an SUD.

    “ECF is basically the control center for governing other cognitive processes,” explained Rebecca Landes McNamee, assistant research professor of radiology and bioengineering at the University of Pittsburgh and corresponding author for the study. “For example, in school, ECF would be engaged in the planning and control process required in answering a question; formulating your response, raising your hand, waiting until you are called upon, and stating your answer. A person with low levels of ECF might blurt out the answer. Another example could be interacting with someone on the playground who upsets you. A person with good ECF will think through the actions and consequences of their behavior rather than responding rashly. A person with low levels of ECF may respond with violence.”

    McNamee and her colleagues decided to use an antisaccade task to reflect the inhibitory response required in the actions above.

    “While this eye-movement task may be more basic in nature than an inhibitory response, it still requires control and response suppression, and is thought to use the same basic mechanisms in the brain as those required in more difficult suppression tasks,” she said. “As response inhibition is something that may be deficient in high-risk children, we thought this task would be a beneficial way to study the workings of basic mechanisms in the brain.”

    The researchers employed fMRI with 25 adolescents (15 males, 10 females), ages 12 to 19 years, during a task that required inhibition of an initial eye-movement response as well as a voluntary realignment to an alternate location. The fMRI findings were categorized into regions of activation: total frontal, parietal, occipital, and temporal lobe. Additionally, each subject’s neurobehavioral disinhibition (ND) – their ability to control an immediate impulsive response to a given situation – was assessed, and the drug use/histories were determined.

    “We found that individuals who exhibit a high amount of ND – that is, do not have a good ability to manage their impulsive responses – have less brain activity in the frontal cortex, the region of the brain responsible for ECF, during the antisaccade task,” said McNamee. “In other words, the regions of the brain responsible for these inhibitory processes engaged less energy in individuals with higher ND scores than those with lower ND scores.”

    Normal adolescent development involves an increase in the ability to inhibit impulsive responses, which would be reflected in an increase in brain activation in areas associated with inhibition, said McNamee.

    “Since some of the children show less ability to inhibit responses – observed as higher levels of ND – along with less brain activity in these areas, we can hypothesize that the reason for this is a delay in the development of brain networks associated with inhibition,” she said. “We cannot say for sure what may cause these deficits, but we suspect it has to do with a combination of genetics inherited from the parents and/or the environment in which the individual was raised.”

    One of the key implications of these findings, said McNamee, is that behaviors and actions are directly related to brain functioning.

    “Teachers, caregivers, and other individuals should understand that each adolescent matures at a different rate; they do not always respond like adults because their brains are not at the same level of functioning as an adult,” she said. “Responses and behaviors related to a certain situation are less easy for some adolescents to manage than others.”

    McNamee plans to follow these adolescents as they mature. “We would like to better understand whether the brains of subjects with higher levels of ND display increasing amounts of brain activation in the frontal lobe as they mature, or if they will continue to show reduced brain activity when compared to subjects with lower ND scores throughout later adolescence. This type of data may help to indicate whether inhibition centers in the brains of high ND subjects ‘catch up’ to those of the lower ND subjects, or if they will always have differences with respect to these brain centers.”

    Results are published in the March 2008 issue of Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research.

    Posted in Addiction, Alcoholism, Brain, Youth and tagged , , . Use this permalink for a bookmark.

    * * * * *

    Aggression and hostility in recovered alcoholics

    There is a long-recognized association between alcohol consumption and aggressive behavior. But does aggression and hostility continue into sobriety?

    This study was designed to examine aggression in a group of socially well-adapted recovered alcoholics.

    The question addressed was whether the treatment, together with long-term abstinence from alcohol, could reduce aggression and hostility in recovered alcoholics.

    Sixty four male stable alcoholics with at least 3 years sobriety were compared with 69 non-alcoholics. Neither group had any other psychological problems.

    Both groups were given a questionnaire on general characteristics as well as aggressive and hostility traits.

    After a 3-year abstinence, men from the recovering alcoholics group displayed greater signs of hostility and covert aggression. They were different from non-alcoholics on measures for indirect aggression, irritability, negativism, suspicion, resentment, and guilt.

    Research report; Ziherl S, Cebasek Travnik Z, Kores Plesnicar B, Tomori M, Zalar B. Trait aggression and hostility in recovered alcoholics. Eur Addict Res 2007; 13(2): 89-93.

    Posted in Adjunctive therapy, Alcohol, Alcoholism, Assessment, Disease of addiction, Men, Relapse prevention, Research, Stages of Change, Symptoms of addiction. Use this permalink for a bookmark.

    * * * * *

    AA and a social model of treatment

    A NATURALISTIC COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES AT SOCIAL AND CLINICAL MODEL SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT PROGRAMS.

    Since the 1970s, much of the public treatment system in California has been based on a social model orientation to recovery for alcoholics, but there has been minimal research on program outcomes. This article reports on follow-up interviews conducted with a representative sample of 722 people who had entered treatment about a year earlier in public and private programs, including publicly-funded social model detoxification and residential programs, and clinical model programs in hospitals and HMO clinics.

    higher levels of 12-step program involvement during follow-up, which strongly predicted an absence of alcohol problems

    • Social model clients came to treatment with more severe legal and employment problems, whereas those seeking treatment at clinical programs reported more severe family problems.
    • At follow-up, clients at both types of programs reported attending a similar number of Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) meetings, but social model clients reported going to more Narcotics Anonymous (NA) meetings and being involved in more AA activities.
    • Social model clients were less likely than clinical model clients to report problems with alcohol or drugs at follow-up, but the odds of reporting other problems (e.g., medical, psychological, legal, family/social) were similar.

    The program effect for better alcohol outcomes at the social model programs was partially explained by their clients’ higher levels of 12-step program involvement during follow-up, which strongly predicted an absence of alcohol problems.

    • Social networks supportive of abstinence also were predictive of reporting no alcohol problems at follow-up.

    In contrast, subsequent detoxification treatment events between baseline and follow-up were associated with a higher odds of reporting alcohol, drug, psychiatric and family/social problems at follow-up.

    These findings are consistent with the growing body of literature reporting higher rates of abstinence among those who are able to construct more positive social networks, and who attend and become involved in 12-step programs during and following treatment.

    It is important that these results be replicated, as they suggest that social model programs are successful in engaging their clients in AA activities and in NA meeting attendance, and could represent for some an effective alternative to clinical model treatment programs.

    Research; LEE ANN KASKUTAS, LYNDSAY AMMON, CONSTANCE WEISNER. A NATURALISTIC COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES AT SOCIAL AND CLINICAL MODEL SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT PROGRAMS. International Journal of Self Help and Self Care; Volume 2, Number 2 / 2003-2004, 111 – 133


    RSS feed keeps you up to date with all research on TSF.

    Posted in 12-Step Groups, Alcohol, Alcoholism, Detoxification, Drugs, Research, Target populations. Use this permalink for a bookmark.

    * * * * *

    TSF and other models

    CONTRAST TO OTHER COUNSELING APPROACHES

    Most Similar Counseling Approaches

    TSF has its roots in the Minnesota Model first described by Daniel J. Anderson and as implemented in most AA-oriented treatment programs (e.g.,the Hazelden Foundation, the Betty Ford Foundation, the Sierra Tuscan Center, and others). These models assume addiction can be arrested but not cured, ascribe to the AA/NA philosophy as described in AA/NA literature that relies heavily on a combination of spirituality and pragmatism, and advocate peer support as the primary means for achieving sustained sobriety.

    Most Dissimilar Counseling Approaches

    Any approach that advocates controlled use of alcohol or other drugs (as compared with abstinence) is fundamentally dissimilar to TSF with respect to basic treatment goals. Cognitive-behavioural approaches that are based on the idea that problem drinking and other drug use stem primarily from inadequate stress management skills and that aim to enhance problem solving and coping skills differ from TSF with respect to the assumption of peer support as fundamental to recovery. TSF also assumes that alcoholism and other drug addiction are primary diagnoses and not symptoms of another diagnosis (e.g., depression, antisocial personality).

    Posted in Contrast to other models, Theory, TSF. Use this permalink for a bookmark.

    * * * * *