On any given day in the United States, one million people are in treatment for alcoholism or drug addiction. It is not getting into treatment, however, that makes the difference. Instead, it is what a person gets out of treatment. The fact that many people do not find success in treatment on their first attempt is due in part to a lack of understanding about what makes effective treatment.

The ten effective elements of treatment are;

1. There is no treatment formula that will work for everyone.

2. Medically supervised withdrawal is only one step in addiction treatment; alone it will do little.

3. Length of treatment counts

4. Drug addiction is a multidimensional problem, and treatment needs to address all of an individual’s needs

5. Counseling (individual and/or group) is a critical part of effective addiction treatment.

6. Medications are an important part of treatment for many people.

7. Drug testing during treatment is important.

8. Alcoholics and addicts with mental health disorders should be treated for both at the same time.

9.Addiction Treatment works even for people who don’t choose it of their own free will.

10. Don’t give up.

As with other chronic illnesses, relapses can occur during or after successful treatment episodes. Addicted individuals may need lengthy treatment and more than one time in treatment before they can enjoy long-term abstinence and full restoration to a drug free life. The period after treatment is just as important as being in treatment. Finding support and continuous work to stay drug free will be necessary. A slip or relapse is just an indicator that more work, and possibly more treatment, is necessary. Don’t give up.

Full story at Recovery Today

See also;

• AA and Treatment Work Better Together
• AA Offers Recovery Not Religion
• If you have healthcare training this manual may help.

A NATURALISTIC COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES AT SOCIAL AND CLINICAL MODEL SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT PROGRAMS.

Since the 1970s, much of the public treatment system in California has been based on a social model orientation to recovery for alcoholics, but there has been minimal research on program outcomes. This article reports on follow-up interviews conducted with a representative sample of 722 people who had entered treatment about a year earlier in public and private programs, including publicly-funded social model detoxification and residential programs, and clinical model programs in hospitals and HMO clinics.

higher levels of 12-step program involvement during follow-up, which strongly predicted an absence of alcohol problems

• Social model clients came to treatment with more severe legal and employment problems, whereas those seeking treatment at clinical programs reported more severe family problems.
• At follow-up, clients at both types of programs reported attending a similar number of Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) meetings, but social model clients reported going to more Narcotics Anonymous (NA) meetings and being involved in more AA activities.
• Social model clients were less likely than clinical model clients to report problems with alcohol or drugs at follow-up, but the odds of reporting other problems (e.g., medical, psychological, legal, family/social) were similar.

The program effect for better alcohol outcomes at the social model programs was partially explained by their clients’ higher levels of 12-step program involvement during follow-up, which strongly predicted an absence of alcohol problems.

• Social networks supportive of abstinence also were predictive of reporting no alcohol problems at follow-up.

In contrast, subsequent detoxification treatment events between baseline and follow-up were associated with a higher odds of reporting alcohol, drug, psychiatric and family/social problems at follow-up.

These findings are consistent with the growing body of literature reporting higher rates of abstinence among those who are able to construct more positive social networks, and who attend and become involved in 12-step programs during and following treatment.

It is important that these results be replicated, as they suggest that social model programs are successful in engaging their clients in AA activities and in NA meeting attendance, and could represent for some an effective alternative to clinical model treatment programs.

Research; LEE ANN KASKUTAS, LYNDSAY AMMON, CONSTANCE WEISNER. A NATURALISTIC COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES AT SOCIAL AND CLINICAL MODEL SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT PROGRAMS. International Journal of Self Help and Self Care; Volume 2, Number 2 / 2003-2004, 111 – 133

RSS feed keeps you up to date with all research on TSF.

A healthy dentist is one of the most important ingredients in a successful dental practice. An ingredient not to be taken for granted. Professionals, dentists included, can and do experience illnesses and problems that can disrupt or impair a practice.

In addition to the vulnerabilities of the human condition–addictive disorders, psychiatric illnesses, infectious disease, family and relationship problems, or the many varieties of human misery–dentists have undergone a powerful process of socialization into their professional role that makes it difficult to seek help for themselves.

Stigma about addictive and psychiatric illnesses continues to be a problem despite significant advances in scientific understanding of these disorders.

Many people, especially those in positions of community visibility as dentists are, still struggle with shame when they associate problems with personal failure.

Dental societies are in an ideal position to provide resources and support, should they choose to take this opportunity, and the ADA has the information and expertise to help them do this.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Dentists can become more aware of their own vulnerabilities and enhance their personal and professional effectiveness, as well as evaluate ways they may support their staff and colleagues.

Research; J Am Dent Assoc. 2004 Jan;135(1):84-9. Safeguarding the health of dental professionals. Lavine SR, Drumm JW, Keating LK.

See also;

• Brief-TSF can assist people cease alcohol consumption.
• Twelve-Step Programs as an Adjunct to Psychotherapy and Psychopharmacology
• Subscribe to Twelve Step Facilitation by e-Mail

Natural Health, Natural Medicine: The Complete Guide to Wellness and Self-Care for Optimum Health by Andrew Weil Read more about this title…

Primary Care Clinicians Lack Comfort, Skills in Discussing Alcohol Use

Often, primary care clinicians inadequately address alcohol use with their patients.

To describe alcohol-related discussions in primary care, investigators audiotaped and performed qualitative analysis of outpatient visits involving 14 primary care clinicians (physicians and nurse practitioners) and 29 of their patients.

All patients were male veterans who screened positive for unhealthy alcohol use.*

Three themes emerged:

• Patients often disclosed that they consumed large amounts of alcohol and/or experienced negative health consequences from drinking.
• Clinicians commonly responded by changing the subject, minimizing the significance of their patients’ drinking, or pursuing a nonalcohol-related issue.
• Hesitation, stuttering, inappropriate laughter, and ambiguous statements were apparent when clinicians discussed alcohol but not other topics.
  Advice about drinking was tentative and vague while advice about smoking was more common, decisive, and specific.

Brief alcohol counseling — an evidence-based practice — has been poorly disseminated into primary care practice. This exploratory study suggests that clinicians’ discomfort and limited skills in assessing and advising patients with unhealthy alcohol use are partly to blame.

Although training alone is not sufficient to increase alcohol counseling, these findings indicate that educational initiatives to improve primary care clinicians’ comfort levels and skills are necessary, nonetheless.

Reprinted with permission from Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence.

Reference: McCormick KA, Cochran NE, Back AL, et al. (2006) How primary care providers talk to patients about alcohol: a qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med., 21(9): 966-972.

From Join Together Online

In Alcohol-Dependent Drinkers, What Does the Presence of Nicotine Dependence Tell Us About Psychiatric and Addictive Disorders Comorbidity?

AIM: To examine the pattern of psychiatric comorbidity associated with nicotine dependence among alcohol-dependent respondents in the general population.

METHODS: Drawn from a US national survey of 43,000 adults who took part in a face-to-face interview (The National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions), data were examined on the 4782 subjects with lifetime alcohol dependence, and comparisons were made between those with and those without nicotine dependence.

RESULTS: Nicotine dependence was reported by 48% of the alcohol-dependent respondents. They reported higher lifetime rates of

• panic disorder,
• specific and social phobia,
• generalized anxiety disorder,
• major depressive episode,
• manic disorder,
• suicide attempt,
• antisocial personality disorder and
• all addictive disorders than those without nicotine dependence.

After controlling for the effects of any psychiatric and addictive disorder, alcohol-dependent subjects with nicotine dependence were more than twice as likely as non-nicotine-dependent, alcohol-dependent subjects to have at least one other lifetime addiction diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio 2.36; 95% confidence interval 2.07-2.68).

CONCLUSIONS: Nicotine dependence represents a general marker of psychiatric comorbidity, particularly of addictive comorbidity. It may be used as a screening measure for psychiatric diagnoses in clinical practice as well as in future trials.

Research report; Le Strat Y, Ramoz N, Gorwood P. In Alcohol-Dependent Drinkers, What Does the Presence of Nicotine Dependence Tell Us About Psychiatric and Addictive Disorders Comorbidity? Alcohol Alcohol. 2010 Jan 20.

• See also;
• Alcoholic, Addictive Behaviors
• Wernicke-Korsakoff Syndrome
• Are Families Affected by Alcoholism?
• What are the Styles of Enablers?
• Hazelden Books and Resources

Models of Craving and Implications for Treatment

By Raymond F. Anton, M.D.

Although many alcoholics experience craving, researchers have not yet developed a common, valid definition of the phenomenon. Numerous models of the mechanisms underlying craving have been suggested, however. One of those models-the neuroadaptive model-suggests that the prolonged presence of alcohol induces changes in brain-cell function. In the absence of alcohol, those changes cause an imbalance in brain activity that results in craving. Furthermore, the adaptive changes generate memories of alcohol’s pleasant effects that can be activated when alcohol-related environmental stimuli are encountered, even after prolonged abstinence, thereby leading to relapse.

Similarly, stressful situations may trigger memories of the relief afforded by alcohol, which could also lead to relapse. Neurobiological and brain-imaging studies have identified numerous brain chemicals and brain regions that may be involved in craving. Psychiatric conditions that affect some of these brain regions, such as depression or anxiety, also may influence craving. A better understanding and more reliable assessment of craving may help clinicians tailor treatment to the specific needs of each patient, thereby reducing the risk of relapse.

Alcohol Research & Health Vol. 23, No. 3, 1999

Dual dependence upon alcohol and illicit drugs

ABSTRACT – Aims: The study investigates severity of alcohol dependence among drug misusers. Specifically, it investigates the inter-relationship of alcohol and drug dependence and associations with alcohol consumption, drug consumption and substance-related problems.

Design, setting, participants: The sample comprised 735 people seeking treatment for drug misuse problems, who were current (last 90 days) drinkers.

Measurements: Data were collected by structured face-to-face interviews. Dependence upon illicit drugs and upon alcohol was measured by the Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS).

Findings: Three groups of drinkers were identified: non-alcohol-dependent drug misusers (63%); low-dependence (19%); and high-dependence (18%). Many drug misusers were drinking excessively and alcohol dependence was related to patterns of alcohol and drug consumption. High-dependence drinkers were more likely to drink extra-strength beer; they were less frequent users of heroin and crack cocaine but more frequent users of benzodiazepines, amphetamines and cocaine powder; they reported more psychological and physical health problems. The SDS was found to have good reliability and validity as a measure of alcohol dependence. SDS scores for alcohol and drug dependence were unrelated.

Conclusions: Alcohol use is an important and under-rated problem in the treatment of drug misusers. A comprehensive assessment of alcohol use among drug misusers should include separate assessments of alcohol consumption, alcohol-related problems and severity of alcohol dependence.

Research; Gossop, Michael; Marsden, John; Stewart, Duncan. Dual dependence: assessment of dependence upon alcohol and illicit drugs, and the relationship of alcohol dependence among drug misusers to patterns of drinking, illicit drug use and health problems. Addiction; Volume 97(2), February 2002, p 169-178.

Persistent pain is prevalent among people with substance use disorders.

It is not known, however, whether such pain increases the risk of relapse following periods of abstinence.

Researchers assessed data on pain and substance use in 397 adults who, as part of a larger randomized trial, had been interviewed periodically in the 24 months after their discharge from an urban, residential alcohol and drug detoxification unit.

Pain was measured with the pain item on the SF-36 Health Survey. Analyses were adjusted for potential confounders (e.g., demographics, addiction severity, depressive symptoms).

• Sixteen percent of subjects reported persistent pain (moderate-to-higher levels of pain at all available interviews) in the 24 months after detoxification.
• Subjects reporting persistent pain were significantly more likely than those with mild or no pain to have used the following in the past 30 days at the 24-month follow-up:
• heroin/opioids not prescribed for pain (odds ratio, 5.4);
• heavy amounts of alcohol* (odds ratio, 2.2).

Comments: Persistent pain is common among alcohol and drug users who have undergone residential detoxification and increases the likelihood of relapse. This study suggests that clinicians must be careful to screen for pain symptoms in patients with substance dependence. When persistent pain is present, thoughtful management is required to minimize risks associated with undertreatment while not fostering opioid analgesic abuse.

Research References:Larson MJ, Paasche-Orlow M, Cheng DM, et al. Persistent pain is associated with substance use after detoxification: a prospective cohort analysis. Addiction. 2007.

The Mindbody Prescription: Healing the Body, Healing the Pain by John E. Sarno Read more about this title…

Domestic violence

Intimate partner violence against women is prevalent and is associated with poor health outcomes.

Understanding indicators of exposure to intimate partner violence can assist health care professionals to identify and respond to abused women. This study was undertaken to determine the strength of association between selected evidence-based risk indicators and exposure to intimate partner violence.

In this cross-sectional study of 768 women aged 18-64 years who presented to 2 emergency departments in Ontario, Canada, participants answered questions about risk indicators and completed the Composite Abuse Scale to determine their exposure to intimate partner violence in the past year.

Results: Intimate partner violence was significantly associated with

• being separated,
• in a common-law relationship or
• single
• depression
• somatic symptoms
• having a male partner who was employed less than part time, or
• having a partner with an alcohol or
• drug problem

Each unit increase in the number of indicators corresponded to a four-fold increase in the risk of intimate partner violence; women with 3 or more indicators had a greater than 50% probability of a positive score on the Composite Abuse Scale.

Intimate partner violence was not associated with pregnancy status.

Specific characteristics of male partners, relationships and women’s mental health are significantly related to exposure to intimate partner violence in the past year. Identification of these indicators has implications for the clinical care of women who present to health care settings. (Source: Open Medicine

The Process of Reconnecting: Recovery from the Perspective of Addicted Women

This study examined women’s experiences with addiction to drugs and/or alcohol and their process of recovery. The techniques of in-depth interviews and participant observations were employed to elicit the perspectives of the women. The study consisted of 12 participants, 6 who were currently involved in a 90-day community-based drug and alcohol treatment program and 6 who had more than five years of recovery.

Grounded theory method guided data collection and analysis. The women in this study described experiences of connectedness and disconnectedness throughout their lives, their addiction, and their recovery. The researcher constructed a substantive theory and model to explain this process of connectedness and disconnectedness.

The findings support that making connections and establishing healthy relationships play a significant role for women in achieving sobriety and maintaining recovery.

Research; The Process of Reconnecting: Recovery from the Perspective of Addicted Women. Carolynn Masters & Dorothy S. Carlson. Journal of Addictions Nursing, Volume 17, Issue 4 December 2006 , pages 205 – 210