One-Year Outcomes among Members of a Dual-Recovery Self-Help Program.

Research Objective: Self-help is gaining increased acceptance among treatment professionals as empirical support for of its effectiveness is growing and the advent of managed care warrants the use of cost-effective modalities. Traditional “one disease-one recovery” self-help programs cannot serve adequately the needs of the dually-diagnosed.

This paper presents one-year outcome data from a longitudinal study of the effectiveness of self-help for the dually-diagnosed.

Subjects are members of Double Trouble in Recovery (DTR), a 12-step self-help program designed to meet the special needs of those diagnosed with both a mental health disorder and a chemical addiction.Study.

Design: The study uses a 12-month prospective longitudinal design with follow-ups at 12 and 24 months after baseline. Subjects (N = 310) were recruited at 25 DTR meeting sites throughout New York City. Semi-structured instruments assess history and current status of mental health and substance abuse, treatment in both areas, and self help participation (DTR as well as traditional 12-step groups such as AA and NA).

Population Studied: Community-based individuals dually-diagnosed with a mental health disorder and substance abuse.

Principal Findings: S’s are mostly members of underserved minority groups with long histories of substance abuse and mental health disorders.

Most S’s attend outpatient treatment (for drug use, mental health or dual-diagnosis – 77%) and take psychotropic medications (87%).

At the 12 months follow-up,

• 76% were still attending DTR;
• 68% were also attending AA or NA.

Mean number of symptoms S’s. experienced in the past year decreased significantly;

• two-thirds (69%) of S’s reported that their mental health was “better” in the past month than it was at baseline.
• One-third (29%) reported substance use in the past year, compared to 42% at baseline (p = .002).

Substance use (less) was significantly associated with DTR attendance:

• Total time abstinent was related to lifetime length of DTR attendance (r = .25, p = .002) and
• past year substance use was related to number of months of DTR attendance in the past year (r = -.17, p = .02).

Conclusions: For dually-diagnosed individuals, continued participation in dual recovery self-help groups plays a significant role in the recovery process, particularly in the area of substance use.

Implications for Policy, Delivery or Practice: Participation in dual-recovery self-help groups, both during and after formal treatment, should be encouraged as part of an integrated lifelong recovery plan for dually-diagnosed individuals.

Research; One-Year Outcomes among Members of a Dual-Recovery Self-Help Program. Laudet A, Magura S, Vogel H, Knight E, Staines G; Abstr Acad Health Serv Res Health Policy Meet. 2000; 17.

More at; Double Trouble in Recovery

See also;

• 12-Step Treatment More Effective than Alternative
• AA and Treatment Work Better Together
• Subscribe to Twelve Step Facilitation by e-Mail

Dual Diagnosis; Counseling the Mentally Ill Substance Abuser by Katie Evans, J. Michael Sullivan Read more about this title…

Depression in 6050 Former Drinkers; Association With Past Alcohol Dependence.

Background; The association between alcoholism and major depression in the general population has been explained as misdiagnosed alcohol intoxication and withdrawal effects mistaken for depressive syndromes.

To investigate whether this could account for the entire relationship, the association of past alcohol dependence with current major depression (ie, non-overlapping time frames) was investigated in individuals who no longer drink or who drink very little.

We conducted the study using data from the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey, a representative sample.

Methods; Former drinkers who did not use drugs or smoke in the past year (n = 6050) were divided into those with and without past DSM-IV alcohol dependence. These 2 groups were compared for the presence of current (last 12 months) DSM-IV major depression. The association between prior alcohol dependence and current major depression was tested with linear logistic regression, controlling for other variables.

Prior alcohol dependence increased the risk of current major depressive disorder more than 4-fold.

Results; Prior alcohol dependence increased the risk of current major depressive disorder more than 4-fold. This relationship was not attenuated by control variables.

The majority of subjects with major depression last used substances 2 or more years prior to the interview, which eliminates acute intoxication or withdrawal effects as an explanation of their depressions.

Conclusions; The strong, specific association between prior alcohol dependence and current or recent major depression in a nationally representative sample of former drinkers indicates that the association is not entirely an artifact of misdiagnosed intoxication and withdrawal effects.

A better understanding of the nature of the relationship between the 2 disorders should be sought and will have important public health significance.

Research report; Deborah S. Hasin; Bridget F. Grant.Major Depression in 6050 Former Drinkers; Association With Past Alcohol Dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59:794-800.

• Alcoholics Have Trouble Identifying Emotions
• Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
• Depressed Men Who Drink More Likely to Commit Suicide
• Depression & 12-Step Programs

A NATURALISTIC COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES AT SOCIAL AND CLINICAL MODEL SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT PROGRAMS.

Since the 1970s, much of the public treatment system in California has been based on a social model orientation to recovery for alcoholics, but there has been minimal research on program outcomes. This article reports on follow-up interviews conducted with a representative sample of 722 people who had entered treatment about a year earlier in public and private programs, including publicly-funded social model detoxification and residential programs, and clinical model programs in hospitals and HMO clinics.

higher levels of 12-step program involvement during follow-up, which strongly predicted an absence of alcohol problems

• Social model clients came to treatment with more severe legal and employment problems, whereas those seeking treatment at clinical programs reported more severe family problems.
• At follow-up, clients at both types of programs reported attending a similar number of Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) meetings, but social model clients reported going to more Narcotics Anonymous (NA) meetings and being involved in more AA activities.
• Social model clients were less likely than clinical model clients to report problems with alcohol or drugs at follow-up, but the odds of reporting other problems (e.g., medical, psychological, legal, family/social) were similar.

The program effect for better alcohol outcomes at the social model programs was partially explained by their clients’ higher levels of 12-step program involvement during follow-up, which strongly predicted an absence of alcohol problems.

• Social networks supportive of abstinence also were predictive of reporting no alcohol problems at follow-up.

In contrast, subsequent detoxification treatment events between baseline and follow-up were associated with a higher odds of reporting alcohol, drug, psychiatric and family/social problems at follow-up.

These findings are consistent with the growing body of literature reporting higher rates of abstinence among those who are able to construct more positive social networks, and who attend and become involved in 12-step programs during and following treatment.

It is important that these results be replicated, as they suggest that social model programs are successful in engaging their clients in AA activities and in NA meeting attendance, and could represent for some an effective alternative to clinical model treatment programs.

Research; LEE ANN KASKUTAS, LYNDSAY AMMON, CONSTANCE WEISNER. A NATURALISTIC COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES AT SOCIAL AND CLINICAL MODEL SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT PROGRAMS. International Journal of Self Help and Self Care; Volume 2, Number 2 / 2003-2004, 111 – 133

RSS feed keeps you up to date with all research on TSF.

AA Utilization After Introduction in Outpatient Treatment.

Abstract; Treatment for alcohol dependence is often provided in outpatient settings, and often includes introduction to the 12-Step fellowship Alcoholics Anonymous (AA).

Relatively little is known about subsequent AA utilization.

Analyses of survey data collected from 72 clients of an outpatient treatment center introduced to AA revealed that, 6 months following intake, a large portion of the responding sample of 55 were still attending AA meetings.

Principal components analysis of self-reports of the frequencies of 12 AA-related behaviors found three dimensions of AA utilization:

• fellowship or social involvement,
• meeting attendance and participation, and
• involvement in bureaucratic functioning and meeting production.

Results suggest it is important to consider these dimensions of utilization for those wishing to understand AA involvement.

Research; Lisa Thomassen. AA Utilization After Introduction in Outpatient Treatment. Substance Use & Misuse, Volume 37, Issue 2 February 2002 , pages 239 – 253

Brief Intervention as a Bridge to AA

Brief Intervention Is Insufficient for Medical Inpatients With Unhealthy Drinking

Data show that brief intervention reduces consumption and consequences among outpatients with unhealthy, but not dependent, alcohol use. To assess whether brief interventions work among medical inpatients with unhealthy drinking,* researchers randomized 341 of such patients to a 30-minute session of motivational counseling in the hospital or to usual care.

Most subjects had alcohol dependence, were unemployed during the previous 3 months, used other drugs, and had substantial psychiatric symptoms. Almost half were hospitalized for an alcohol-related medical diagnosis.

At 3 months among subjects with alcohol dependence, similar proportions of the intervention and control groups received alcohol assistance (e.g., specialty treatment) (49% and 44%, respectively).

At 12 months among all subjects, decreases in alcohol consumption did not significantly differ between the groups (e.g., adjusted mean decreases in drinks per day, 1.5 for intervention subjects and 3.1 for usual care subjects).

Comments:

Unlike most brief intervention studies in outpatients, this study enrolled a predominantly alcohol-dependent sample with major comorbidities—a group reflective of the treatment-resistant population identified when screening occurs in inpatient settings. The study suggests that screening, assessment, and brief counseling are necessary but not sufficient to change alcohol consumption in this population. Although the findings are disappointing, this study underscores that alcoholism—like cancer, atherosclerosis and other complex diseases—will not succumb to simple solutions.

References: Saitz R, Palfai TP, Cheng DM, et al. Brief intervention for medical inpatients with unhealthy alcohol use: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(3):167–176.

• Brief-TSF extends brief intervention to lifelong recovery.

Primary Care Clinicians Lack Comfort, Skills in Discussing Alcohol Use

Often, primary care clinicians inadequately address alcohol use with their patients.

To describe alcohol-related discussions in primary care, investigators audiotaped and performed qualitative analysis of outpatient visits involving 14 primary care clinicians (physicians and nurse practitioners) and 29 of their patients.

All patients were male veterans who screened positive for unhealthy alcohol use.*

Three themes emerged:

• Patients often disclosed that they consumed large amounts of alcohol and/or experienced negative health consequences from drinking.
• Clinicians commonly responded by changing the subject, minimizing the significance of their patients’ drinking, or pursuing a nonalcohol-related issue.
• Hesitation, stuttering, inappropriate laughter, and ambiguous statements were apparent when clinicians discussed alcohol but not other topics.
  Advice about drinking was tentative and vague while advice about smoking was more common, decisive, and specific.

Brief alcohol counseling — an evidence-based practice — has been poorly disseminated into primary care practice. This exploratory study suggests that clinicians’ discomfort and limited skills in assessing and advising patients with unhealthy alcohol use are partly to blame.

Although training alone is not sufficient to increase alcohol counseling, these findings indicate that educational initiatives to improve primary care clinicians’ comfort levels and skills are necessary, nonetheless.

Reprinted with permission from Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence.

Reference: McCormick KA, Cochran NE, Back AL, et al. (2006) How primary care providers talk to patients about alcohol: a qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med., 21(9): 966-972.

From Join Together Online

If you continue to attend AA and not drop out you have nearly double chance of remaining abstinent.

Estimated Alcoholics Anonymous Membership 1991-1992

• New members during past year – 0.9 million
• On-going members – 1.5 million
• Total membership – 2.4 million

Continuation Rate in Alcoholics Anonymous

In 1991-1992 4.8 million respondents reported ever attending an Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) meeting, for reasons related to their drinking, prior to the last 12 months and 31% reported continued AA attendance during the last 12 months.

Rate of continued AA attendance was associated with years since first AA meeting

• 1-4 years since first AA meeting – 36% remained
• 5-9 years since first AA meeting – 30% remained
• 10-19 years since first AA meeting – 29% remained
• 20 years or more since first AA meeting – 32% remained

Comparison of Past Year Drinking Status – Dropouts and Continuing AA Members

Dropouts:

• Abstinent 33%
• Low risk drinking 14%
• High risk drinking 53%

Continued AA attendance:

• Abstinent 62%
• Low risk drinking 9%
• High risk drinking 29%

1. low risk drinking = never exceed 4 drinks per day(male) or 3 drinks per day (female)
2. high risk drinking = exceeds 4 drinks per day (male) or 3 drinks per day (female)

Research Source: NIAAA 1991-1992 National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey (NLAES). Data Brief – National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey (NLAES) Findings on Alcoholics Anonymous Membership by Loran Archer.

Thus, 36% remain attending A.A. at the end of one year and 32% are still attending at the end of 20 years.

Helping other alcoholics in Alcoholics Anonymous and drinking outcomes: findings from project MATCH.

OBJECTIVE: Although Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) is the largest mutual-help organization for alcoholics in the world, its specific mechanisms that mobilize and sustain behavior change are poorly understood. The purpose of this study is to examine prospectively the relationship between helping other alcoholics and relapse in the year following treatment for alcohol use disorders.

METHOD: Data were derived from Project MATCH, a longitudinal prospective investigation of the efficacy of three behavioral treatments for alcohol abuse and dependence. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to calculate probabilities of time to alcohol relapse. To identify the unique value of helping other alcoholics when controlling for the number of AA meetings attended, proportional hazards regressions were conducted to determine whether the likelihood of relapse was lower for those who were helping other alcoholics.

RESULTS: There were no demographic differences that distinguished participants in regard to involvement in helping other alcoholics, with the exception of age; those who were helping other alcoholics were, on average, 3 years older than those who were not helping alcoholics.

Those who were helping were significantly less likely to relapse in the year following treatment, independent of the number of AA meetings attended.

CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide compelling evidence that recovering alcoholics who help other alcoholics maintain long-term sobriety following formal treatment are themselves better able to maintain their own sobriety. Clinicians who treat persons with substance abuse disorders should encourage their clients to help other recovering alcoholics to stay sober.

Research; Pagano ME, Friend KB, Tonigan JS, Stout RL. Helping other alcoholics in alcoholics anonymous and drinking outcomes: findings from project MATCH. J Stud Alcohol. 2004 Nov;65(6):766-73.

Subscribe to free RSS news feeds.

Coping Strategies of Female Victims of Child Abuse in Treatment for Substance Abuse Relapse: Their Advice to Other Women and Healthcare Professionals,

Abstract

This study was a part of a larger qualitative descriptive study designed to explore chronic sorrow as a relapse trigger among female victims of child abuse who were currently enrolled in substance abuse treatment for relapse.

The purpose of this study was to identify coping strategies and other factors these women perceived as helpful to their recovery. A purposive sample of twelve women participated in interviews using a semistructured interview schedule.

The advice the participants offered to women in similar situations reflected interpersonal, cognitive and action-focused positive coping strategies.

They encouraged clinicians in primary care facilities to approach persons suspected of substance abuse in a nonjudgmental manner. Healthcare professionals should be more assertive in recommending resources for substance abuse treatment.

Research; Cheryl Slaughter Smith. Coping Strategies of Female Victims of Child Abuse in Treatment for Substance Abuse Relapse: Their Advice to Other Women and Healthcare Professionals, Journal of Addictions Nursing, Volume 18, Issue 2 April 2007 , pages 75 – 80

Update on neuropharmacological treatments for alcoholism: Scientific basis and clinical findings.

The past decade has seen an expansion of research and knowledge on pharmacotherapy for the treatment of alcohol dependence.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications naltrexone and acamprosate have shown mixed results in clinical trials.

Oral naltrexone and naltrexone depot formulations have generally demonstrated efficacy at treating alcohol dependence, but their treatment effect size is small, and more research is needed to compare the effects of different doses on drinking outcome.

Acamprosate has demonstrated efficacy for treating alcohol dependence in European trials, but with a small effect size. In U.S. trials, acamprosate has not proved to be efficacious.

Research continues to explore which types of alcohol-dependent individual would benefit the most from treatment with naltrexone or acamprosate.

The combination of the two medications demonstrated efficacy for treating alcohol dependence in one European study but not in a multi-site U.S. study.

Another US FDA-approved medication, disulfiram, is an aversive agent that does not diminish craving for alcohol. Disulfiram is most effective when given to those who are highly compliant or who are receiving their medication under supervision.

Of the non-approved medications, topiramate is among the most promising, with a medium effect size in clinical trials.

Another promising medication, baclofen, has shown efficacy in small trials.

Serotonergic agents such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and the serotonin-3 receptor antagonist, ondansetron, appear to be efficacious only among certain genetic subtypes of alcoholic.

As neuroscientific research progresses, other promising medications, as well as medication combinations, for treating alcohol dependence continue to be explored.

Research; Johnson BA. Update on neuropharmacological treatments for alcoholism: Scientific basis and clinical findings. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007 Aug 9;

Brief-TSF is an excellent psychosocial adjunctive therapy with anticraving medications.