One-Year Outcomes among Members of a Dual-Recovery Self-Help Program.

Research Objective: Self-help is gaining increased acceptance among treatment professionals as empirical support for of its effectiveness is growing and the advent of managed care warrants the use of cost-effective modalities. Traditional “one disease-one recovery” self-help programs cannot serve adequately the needs of the dually-diagnosed.

This paper presents one-year outcome data from a longitudinal study of the effectiveness of self-help for the dually-diagnosed.

Subjects are members of Double Trouble in Recovery (DTR), a 12-step self-help program designed to meet the special needs of those diagnosed with both a mental health disorder and a chemical addiction.Study.

Design: The study uses a 12-month prospective longitudinal design with follow-ups at 12 and 24 months after baseline. Subjects (N = 310) were recruited at 25 DTR meeting sites throughout New York City. Semi-structured instruments assess history and current status of mental health and substance abuse, treatment in both areas, and self help participation (DTR as well as traditional 12-step groups such as AA and NA).

Population Studied: Community-based individuals dually-diagnosed with a mental health disorder and substance abuse.

Principal Findings: S’s are mostly members of underserved minority groups with long histories of substance abuse and mental health disorders.

Most S’s attend outpatient treatment (for drug use, mental health or dual-diagnosis – 77%) and take psychotropic medications (87%).

At the 12 months follow-up,

• 76% were still attending DTR;
• 68% were also attending AA or NA.

Mean number of symptoms S’s. experienced in the past year decreased significantly;

• two-thirds (69%) of S’s reported that their mental health was “better” in the past month than it was at baseline.
• One-third (29%) reported substance use in the past year, compared to 42% at baseline (p = .002).

Substance use (less) was significantly associated with DTR attendance:

• Total time abstinent was related to lifetime length of DTR attendance (r = .25, p = .002) and
• past year substance use was related to number of months of DTR attendance in the past year (r = -.17, p = .02).

Conclusions: For dually-diagnosed individuals, continued participation in dual recovery self-help groups plays a significant role in the recovery process, particularly in the area of substance use.

Implications for Policy, Delivery or Practice: Participation in dual-recovery self-help groups, both during and after formal treatment, should be encouraged as part of an integrated lifelong recovery plan for dually-diagnosed individuals.

Research; One-Year Outcomes among Members of a Dual-Recovery Self-Help Program. Laudet A, Magura S, Vogel H, Knight E, Staines G; Abstr Acad Health Serv Res Health Policy Meet. 2000; 17.

More at; Double Trouble in Recovery

See also;

• 12-Step Treatment More Effective than Alternative
• AA and Treatment Work Better Together
• Subscribe to Twelve Step Facilitation by e-Mail

Dual Diagnosis; Counseling the Mentally Ill Substance Abuser by Katie Evans, J. Michael Sullivan Read more about this title…

On any given day in the United States, one million people are in treatment for alcoholism or drug addiction. It is not getting into treatment, however, that makes the difference. Instead, it is what a person gets out of treatment. The fact that many people do not find success in treatment on their first attempt is due in part to a lack of understanding about what makes effective treatment.

The ten effective elements of treatment are;

1. There is no treatment formula that will work for everyone.

2. Medically supervised withdrawal is only one step in addiction treatment; alone it will do little.

3. Length of treatment counts

4. Drug addiction is a multidimensional problem, and treatment needs to address all of an individual’s needs

5. Counseling (individual and/or group) is a critical part of effective addiction treatment.

6. Medications are an important part of treatment for many people.

7. Drug testing during treatment is important.

8. Alcoholics and addicts with mental health disorders should be treated for both at the same time.

9.Addiction Treatment works even for people who don’t choose it of their own free will.

10. Don’t give up.

As with other chronic illnesses, relapses can occur during or after successful treatment episodes. Addicted individuals may need lengthy treatment and more than one time in treatment before they can enjoy long-term abstinence and full restoration to a drug free life. The period after treatment is just as important as being in treatment. Finding support and continuous work to stay drug free will be necessary. A slip or relapse is just an indicator that more work, and possibly more treatment, is necessary. Don’t give up.

Full story at Recovery Today

See also;

• AA and Treatment Work Better Together
• AA Offers Recovery Not Religion
• If you have healthcare training this manual may help.

A healthy dentist is one of the most important ingredients in a successful dental practice. An ingredient not to be taken for granted. Professionals, dentists included, can and do experience illnesses and problems that can disrupt or impair a practice.

In addition to the vulnerabilities of the human condition–addictive disorders, psychiatric illnesses, infectious disease, family and relationship problems, or the many varieties of human misery–dentists have undergone a powerful process of socialization into their professional role that makes it difficult to seek help for themselves.

Stigma about addictive and psychiatric illnesses continues to be a problem despite significant advances in scientific understanding of these disorders.

Many people, especially those in positions of community visibility as dentists are, still struggle with shame when they associate problems with personal failure.

Dental societies are in an ideal position to provide resources and support, should they choose to take this opportunity, and the ADA has the information and expertise to help them do this.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Dentists can become more aware of their own vulnerabilities and enhance their personal and professional effectiveness, as well as evaluate ways they may support their staff and colleagues.

Research; J Am Dent Assoc. 2004 Jan;135(1):84-9. Safeguarding the health of dental professionals. Lavine SR, Drumm JW, Keating LK.

See also;

• Brief-TSF can assist people cease alcohol consumption.
• Twelve-Step Programs as an Adjunct to Psychotherapy and Psychopharmacology
• Subscribe to Twelve Step Facilitation by e-Mail

Natural Health, Natural Medicine: The Complete Guide to Wellness and Self-Care for Optimum Health by Andrew Weil Read more about this title…

Affiliation with Alcoholics Anonymous after treatment: A study of its therapeutic effects and mechanisms of action.

Relatively little is known about how substance abuse treatment facilitates positive outcomes.

This study examined the therapeutic effects and mechanisms of action of affiliation with Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) after treatment. Patients (N = 100) in intensive 12-step substance abuse treatment were assessed during treatment and at 1- and 6-month follow-ups.

Results indicated that increased affiliation with AA predicted better outcomes.

The effects of AA affiliation were mediated by a set of common change factors.

Affiliation with AA after treatment was related to maintenance of self-efficacy and motivation, as well as to increased active coping efforts.

These processes, in turn, were significant predictors of outcome. Findings help to illustrate the value of embedding a test of explanatory models in an evaluation study.

Research; Morgenstern, Jon; Labouvie, Erich; McCrady, Barbara S; Kahler, Christopher W; Frey, Ronni M. Affiliation with Alcoholics Anonymous after treatment: A study of its therapeutic effects and mechanisms of action. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology. Vol 65(5), Oct 1997, 768-777.

Risk factors for non-remission among initially untreated individuals with alcohol use disorders

This study identified risk factors for 1-year and 8-year non-remission among initially untreated individuals with alcohol use disorders and examined whether a longer duration of professional treatment or Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) increased the likelihood of remission, moderated the influence of risk factors on remission status and reduced modifiable risk factors.

A sample of individuals with alcohol use disorders (N=473) was recruited at alcoholism information and referral centers and detoxification units and was surveyed at baseline and 1 year, 3 years and 8 years later. At each contact, participants completed an inventory that assessed their alcohol-related problems and personal characteristics and their participation in treatment and AA since the last assessment. An 11-item baseline risk index was associated with 1-year non-remission.

Longer duration of treatment and AA in the first year predicted remission and a decline in modifiable risk factors.

In addition, longer duration of AA increased the likelihood of remission more among high-risk than among low-risk individuals.

The risk factors at 1 year were associated with 8-year non-remission; longer duration of additional treatment or AA was associated with a higher likelihood of 8-year remission and further reductions in modifiable risk factors.

Referral counselors and treatment providers can identify high-risk individuals early in their help-seeking career and intervene to reduce the likelihood of a chronic course of their alcohol use disorder.

Research report; Moos, R.H.; Moos, B.S. Risk factors for non-remission among initially untreated individuals with alcohol use disorders. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64(4):555-563, 2003.

How do alcoholics get to AA?¹

AA has grown to over 100,000 groups world wide with more than two million members simply on word-of-mouth recommendation. Often the recommendation has come from friends, family, employers, healthcare workers or law courts.

People progress through stages of affiliation with others and with Alcoholics Anonymous in pursuit of solutions to their problems. Two paths are identified; Direct Affiliation and Facilitated Affiliation².

Read the rest of this entry

A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment

This article first explains the conceptual framework and plan of a naturalistic, multisite evaluation of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) substance abuse treatment programs. It then examines the effectiveness of an index episode of inpatient treatment and the effectiveness of continuing outpatient care and participation in self-help groups.

The study was conducted among 3018 patients from 15 VA programs that emphasized 12-Step, cognitive-behavioral (CB), or eclectic treatment.

Casemix-adjusted 1-year outcomes showed that patients in 12-Step programs were the most likely to be abstinent, free of substance abuse problems, and employed at the 1-year follow-up.

Patients who obtained more regular and more intensive outpatient mental health care, and those who participated more in 12-Step self-help groups, were more likely to be abstinent and free of substance use problems at the 1-year follow-up.

These findings support the effectiveness of 12-Step treatment and show that patients with substance use disorders who become more involved in outpatient care and self-help groups tend to experience better short-term substance use outcomes.

Moos RH, Finney JW, Ouimette PC, Suchinsky RT. A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1999 Mar;23(3):529-36.

Encouraging post-treatment self-help group involvement to reduce demand for continuing care services: two-year clinical and utilization outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence indicates that addiction and psychiatric treatment programs that actively promote self-help group involvement can reduce their patients’ health care costs in the first year after treatment, but such initially impressive effects may wane over time. This paper examines whether the positive clinical outcomes and reduced health care costs evident 1 year after treatment among substance-dependent patients who were strongly encouraged to attend 12-step self-help groups were sustained at 2-year follow-up.

METHODS: A 2-year quasi-experimental analysis of matched samples of male substance-dependent patients who were treated in either 12-step-based (n=887 patients) or cognitive-behavioral (CB, n=887 patients) treatment programs. The 12-step-based programs placed substantially more emphasis on 12-step concepts, had more staff members “in recovery,” had a more spiritually oriented treatment environment, and promoted self-help group involvement much more extensively than did the CB programs. The 2-year follow-up assessed patients’ substance use, psychiatric functioning, self-help group affiliation, and mental health care utilization and costs.

the only difference in clinical outcomes was a substantially higher abstinence rate among patients treated in 12-step (49.5%) versus CB (37.0%) programs.

RESULTS: As had been the case in the 1-year follow-up of this sample, the only difference in clinical outcomes was a substantially higher abstinence rate among patients treated in 12-step (49.5%) versus CB (37.0%) programs. Twelve-step treatment patients had 50 to 100% higher scores on indices of 12-step self-help group involvement than did patients from CB programs. In contrast, patients from CB programs relied significantly more on outpatient and inpatient mental health services, leading to 30% lower costs in the 12-step treatment programs. This was smaller than the difference in cost identified at 1 year, but still significant ($2,440 per patient, p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: Promoting self-help group involvement appears to improve posttreatment outcomes while reducing the costs of continuing care. Even cost offsets that somewhat diminish over the long term can yield substantial savings.

Actively promoting self-help group involvement may therefore be a useful clinical practice for helping addicted patients recover in a time of constrained fiscal resources.

Humphreys K, Moos RH. Encouraging posttreatment self-help group involvement to reduce demand for continuing care services: two-year clinical and utilization outcomes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007 Jan;31(1):64-8.

The 1956 General Service Conference of A.A. adopted unanimously the following statement of “A.A.’s Public Information

Policy”: In all public relationships, A.A.’s sole objective is to help the still suffering alcoholic. Always mindful of the importance of personal anonymity, we believe this can be done by making known to him, and to those who may be interested in his problem, our own experience as individuals and as a fellowship in learning to live without alcohol. We believe that our experience should be made available freely to all who express sincere interest.

We believe further that all our efforts in this field should always reflect our gratitude for the gift of sobriety and our awareness that many outside A.A. are equally concerned with the serious problem of alcoholism.

This statement reflects a longstanding A.A. tradition of not seeking publicity for promotional purposes, but of always being willing to cooperate with representatives of all media who seek information about the recovery program or about the structure of the Fellowship. Thousands of inquiries of this type are handled each year at the General Service Office (475 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10115; mail address: Box 459, Grand Central Station, New York, NY 10163; telephone: 2128703400; www.aa.org). Many countries have local website’s that can be accessed from this main site.

Information and public relations matters affecting the Fellowship of A.A. as a whole are the concern of the Public Information Committee and the Committee on Cooperation with the Professional Community/Treatment Facilities of the General Service Board of Alcoholics Anonymous.

Reporters are welcome at A.A. open meetings, dinners, regional gettogethers, or similar gatherings of recovered alcoholics.

The only restriction is a request not to disclose the name of any A.A. member. (For obvious reasons, photographs cannot be taken at A.A. meetings.)

Note: In many areas, A.A. members have established committees on public information and cooperation with the professional community, to assist local media in obtaining accurate information about the Fellowship. Background material on A.A. may also be obtained upon request from these groups.

A.A. FACT FILE; PREPARED BY GENERAL SERVICE OFFICE OF ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS

Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) The recovery from alcoholism: Twelve steps of Alcoholics Anonymous.

AA is a self-help, volunteer organization begun in the mid-1930s that views alcoholism as a disease, not a defect of will.

Its founders, themselves alcoholics, maintained that persons with the disease should completely stop drinking, but they did not concern those who could handle alcohol. This position contrasted with the premises of most temperance advocates, who saw drinking as a moral choice and opposed any alcohol use by anyone.

The Twelve Steps embody the wisdom of the founders of AA about pursuing ongoing recovery from alcoholism.

The procedure they describe has evolved into one of the most successful programs for helping alcoholics.

Many drug treatment programs also have based themselves on this twelve-step model.

The abbreviated Twelve Steps are:

1. admission of powerlessness;
2. belief in a Higher Power;
3. submission of one’s will to that Power;
4. self-examination;
5. admission of wrongs within self;
6. readiness to have a Higher Power remove these faults;
7. humble prayer for removal of these short-comings;
8. list persons whom one has offended;
9. make restitution to those whom one has offended;
10. continue to take personal inventory;
11. seek through prayer and meditation to improve conscious contact with God; and
12. having realized a spiritual awakening, try to carry this message to alcoholics and practice these principles in all affairs.

Research; Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) The recovery from alcoholism: Twelve steps of Alcoholics Anonymous. In: D.F. Musto, Drugs in America: A Documentary History, New York, NY: New York University Press, 2002. 574 p. (pp. 158-159)